Doctoral Of Management

This course provides an understanding of quantitative research processes and approaches to explain and test relationships among variables in the field of management. Students are equipped with the skills to design research, develop instruments, collect data, and apply statistical analysis appropriately. Through this course, students are expected to be able to produce quantitative research that is valid, reliable, and scientifically sound.

CPMK1: Be able to explain the paradigms and concepts of quantitative research CPMK2: Able to analyze and evaluate the formulation of research problems, objectives, and gaps CPMK3: Able to develop research hypotheses, operationalize variables and indicators, and determine the research design or model CPMK4: Be able to analyze and evaluate sampling techniques, determine sample size, and select research instruments using data collection methods that uphold research ethics CPMK5: Possess the ability to analyze and evaluate data processing techniques such as descriptive statistical analysis and inferential statistical analysis CPMK6: Possess the ability to analyze and evaluate the presentation of research findings and discussions, as well as the writing of research reports

SCPMK1: Be able to explain the paradigms and basic concepts of quantitative research SCPMK2: Ability to analyze and evaluate research problems, objectives, and gaps SCPMK3: Able to analyze theoretical frameworks and conceptual models SCPMK4: Able to develop research hypotheses SCPMK5: Able to develop operational definitions for research variables and indicators SCPMK6: Ability to analyze the selection and determination of research designs SCPMK7: Able to analyze and evaluate sampling techniques and sample size determination SCPMK8: Able to evaluate the development of research instruments SCPMK9: Ability to analyze and evaluate data collection techniques and research ethics SCPMK10: Ability to perform descriptive statistical analysis and test classical assumptions SCPMK11: Able to analyze data processing using path analysis methods SCPMK12: Able to evaluate mediation and moderation analyses SCPMK13: Be able to explain structural equation modeling analysis SCPMK14: Able to analyze and evaluate research findings and discussions

AP1: Pre Test AP2: Learning AP3: Post Test AP4: Learning AP5: Post Test AP6: Learning AP7: Post Test AP8: Project AP9: Post Test AP10: Learning AP11: Pre Test AP12: Learning AP13: Post Test AP14: Learning AP15: Post Test AP16: Learning AP17: Post Test AP18: Learning AP19: Post Test AP20: Learning AP21: Post Test AP22: Learning AP23: Pre Test AP24: Learning AP25: Post Test AP26: Learning AP27: Post Test AP28: Learning AP29: Pre Test AP30: Learning AP31: Post Test AP32: Learning AP33: Post Test AP34: Learning AP35: Post Test AP36: Learning AP37: Post Test AP38: Project AP39: Learning AP40: Project

TP1: Understanding and Explaining the Nature of Quantitative Research TP2: Understanding Characteristics, Strengths, and Limitations TP3: Understanding the Differences Between Qualitative and Mixed-Methods Research TP4: Developing a Research Gap Analysis TP5: Formulating the Research Question TP6: Conducting a Scientific Literature Review TP7: Developing an integrated theoretical framework TP8: Identify the nature of the relationship (direct, indirect, moderation, mediation) TP9: Project: Defining Data Management TP10: Analyzing the results for normality, linearity, multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity, and autocorrelation TP11: Analyzing the Interpretation of Coefficients TP12: Analysis t-test, F-test, R², adjusted R² TP13: Evaluating measurement models and structural models TP14: Conducting an academic and theory-based discussion TP15: Outlining the theoretical and practical implications TP16: Interpreting the results using academic language TP17: Introduction to Multivariate Analysis and SEM TP18: Mediation and Moderation Analysis TP19: Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research TP20: Multivariate Analysis and SEM TP21: Project: Drafting Chapters 1–6 in a coherent and logical manner TP22: “Implementing Ethics in Scientific Writing & Anti-Plagiarism” TP23: Evaluating Proposals TP24: Project: Conducting Data Analysis and Preparing a Research Report

BK1: content: Adirinekso, G. P., dkk. (2024). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif: Teori komprehensif dan referensi wajib bagi peneliti. Sonpedia Publishing. description: Deskripsi 1 BK2: content: Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. description: Deskripsi 2 BK3: content: Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications description: Deskripsi 3 BK4: content: Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Alfabeta description: Deskripsi 4

Provides an in-depth understanding of the influence of philosophical concepts on management practice. This course explores the relationship between philosophical theories and management principles, as well as how ethical and philosophical values shape decision-making, behavior, and organizational culture.

CPMK1: Be able to explain the basic concepts and the development of philosophical thought relevant to management science, including various philosophical schools of thought. CPMK2: Be able to analyze and evaluate different scientific paradigms, and understand the contribution of philosophy to the development of those paradigms CPMK3: Be able to apply philosophical principles in a managerial context, including in decision-making and conflict resolution within an organization. CPMK4: Be able to formulate new theories or develop existing ones based on a strong philosophical foundation, in order to address practical challenges in management. CPMK5: Has the ability to conduct in-depth research that integrates philosophy and management science, and to publish the results in scientific journals CPMK6: uses a philosophical approach to analyze complex managerial problems and offers innovative and ethical solutions

SCPMK1: Be able to explain the basic concepts and the development of philosophical thought in ontology, epistemology, and axiology, as well as the application of philosophy in business and the associated challenges and opportunities SCPMK2: Be able to analyze and evaluate different management paradigms, and understand the contribution of philosophy to the development of management science SCPMK3: Able to integrate philosophical perspectives into the business planning process, ensuring that short-term and long-term goals align with ethical values SCPMK4: Able to analyze and evaluate various existing organizational structures and cultures, taking into account the philosophical perspectives that influence how organizations operate. SCPMK5: Be able to analyze and integrate philosophical principles into leadership practice, and understand their impact on team and organizational performance. SCPMK6: Be able to use a critical thinking approach to analyze problems in monitoring and control and formulate innovative solutions. SCPMK7: Be able to use a critical thinking approach to evaluate situations involving individual behavior in business and formulate innovative solutions. SCPMK8: Able to formulate strategies to empower employees so they remain motivated and contribute to the fullest extent possible in line with the organization’s values. SCPMK9: Be able to relate philosophical principles to teamwork practices, and understand how ethical values influence interactions and collaboration among group members. SCPMK10: Able to formulate strategies to develop or change the organizational culture in accordance with the organization’s goals and values. SCPMK11: Be able to explain how the level of employee commitment affects performance, retention, and loyalty to the organization. SCPMK12: Be able to analyze the conditions that support or hinder OCB within an organization and formulate recommendations to enhance such positive behavior. SCPMK13: Able to formulate strategies for implementing digitalization in organizational governance, ensuring a sustainable technology transition and upholding ethical values. SCPMK14: Be able to relate philosophical and ethical principles to change management, and understand how those values influence the organizational transformation process.

AP1: Pre Test AP2: Learning AP3: Post Test AP4: Pre Test AP5: Learning AP6: Post Test AP7: Pre Test AP8: Learning AP9: Post Test AP10: Pre Test AP11: Learning AP12: Post Test AP13: Pre Test AP14: Learning AP15: Post Test AP16: Pre Test AP17: Learning AP18: Post Test AP19: Pre Test AP20: Learning AP21: Post Test AP22: Project AP23: Pre Test AP24: Learning AP25: Post Test AP26: Pre Test AP27: Learning AP28: Post Test AP29: Pre Test AP30: Learning AP31: Post Test AP32: Pre Test AP33: Learning AP34: Learning AP35: Post Test AP36: Learning AP37: Learning

TP1: Introduction to Philosophy and the Philosophy of Science TP2: The Nature of Science TP3: Ontology in Management Science TP4: PROJECT — Paradigm Analysis in Management Theory TP5: Epistemology in Management Science TP6: Axiology in Management Science TP7: Logic and Reasoning in Managerial Decision-Making TP8: Paradigms and the Scientific Revolution TP9: Positivism and Postpositivism in Management Science TP10: Interpretivism and Constructivism TP11: The Critical Paradigm in Management Science TP12: The Postmodern Paradigm in Organizations and Management TP13: PROJECT — A Philosophical Critique of Management Practices TP14: Management as a Science, an Art, and a Practice TP15: The Philosophy of Humanity and Organizational Behavior TP16: PROJECT — Designing the Management Paradigm of the Future

BK1: content: Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. London: Heinemann. description: Deskripsi 1 BK2: content: Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press. description: Deskripsi 2 BK3: content: Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research.” Dalam N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage. description: Deskripsi 3

The Scientific Article Writing course was designed to equip students with practical and strategic skills in transforming research results into high-quality scientific article manuscripts that are ready to be published in nationally accredited journals (SINTA) and internationally reputable journals (Scopus/WoS).

CPMK1: Able to design scientific article drafts that are logically structured according to IMRaD (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) structure standards and guidelines for reputable journals CPMK2: Able to synthesize scientific arguments and transform research data into communicative narrative findings that are oriented towards scientific contributions. CPMK3: Able to implement publication ethics, digital citation management, and strategies to prevent plagiarism and data manipulation. CPMK4: Able to manage the submission process, respond to reviewer reviews (rejoinder letters), and revise manuscripts until they are ready for publication in accredited/reputable journals.

SCPMK1: Able to formulate attractive titles, informative abstracts, and precise keywords to increase the discoverability of articles. SCPMK2: Able to compile a background (introduction) that contains novelty, research gaps, and scientific contributions in a convincing manner. SCPMK3: Able to describe Research Methodology (Methods) in a transparent, detailed and replicable manner. SCPMK4: Able to present research results in the form of effective data visualizations (tables and graphs) and free from narrative redundancy. SCPMK5: Able to compile in-depth discussions by linking empirical findings to previous theories and research. SCPMK6: Able to operate reference management tools (such as Mendeley/Zotero) for precision citation and automatic bibliography organization. SCPMK7: Able to apply academic writing ethics, manage the level of manuscript similarity (similarity index), and comply with the limitations of AI use. SCPMK8: Able to conduct analysis of target journal suitability (journal matching), prepare cover letters, and compose critical responses to reviewer input.

AP1: Pre Test AP2: Learning AP3: Post Test AP4: Learning AP5: Post Test AP6: Learning AP7: Post Test AP8: Project AP9: Pre Test AP10: Learning AP11: Post Test AP12: Learning AP13: Post Test AP14: Learning AP15: Post Test AP16: Learning AP17: Post Test AP18: Learning AP19: Post Test AP20: Learning AP21: Post Test AP22: Project AP23: Pre Test AP24: Learning AP25: Post Test AP26: Learning AP27: Post Test AP28: Learning AP29: Post Test AP30: Learning AP31: Post Test AP32: Learning AP33: Post Test AP34: Learning AP35: Post Test AP36: Learning AP37: Post Test AP38: Learning AP39: Post Test AP40: Learning AP41: Post Test AP42: Learning AP43: Post Test AP44: Learning AP45: Post Test AP46: Learning AP47: Post Test AP48: Learning AP49: Post Test AP50: Learning AP51: Post Test AP52: Learning AP53: Post Test AP54: Learning AP55: Post Test AP56: Learning AP57: Post Test AP58: Project

TP1: Anatomy of International Standard Scientific Manuscripts (IMRaD and Non-IMRaD Structures). TP2: Techniques for Formulating Article Titles that are Informative, Specific, and Search-Engine Optimized (SEO). TP3: Compiling Effective Abstracts (Structured Model vs Unstructured Abstract). TP4: Strategic Keyword Selection to Increase Citations and Discoverability. TP5: Designing an Introduction Structure Based on the Funnel Pattern (General to Specific). TP6: Background Building Techniques that Focus on Research Gaps and Novelty. TP7: Formulation of Research Questions and Research Objectives that are Precise in the Introduction. TP8: Affirming Theoretical and Practical Contributions in the Closing Paragraph of the Introduction. TP9: Project : Introduction Draft Review: Complete a full draft of the Introduction section and conduct peer-review between students. TP10: Draft a methods section that describes the quantitative/qualitative approach in detail. TP11: Replicable Description of Population, Sample, Variables, and Concept Operationalization. TP12: Presenting Data Analysis Techniques (Quantitative/Qualitative) in a Comprehensive Manner. TP13: Compile a narrative of research results without repeating all the numbers already in the table. TP14: Transition from Empirical Results to Discussion: Answering Research Questions. TP15: Techniques for Linking Empirical Findings to Main Theories and Previous Research. TP16: Project: Complete a combined draft of the Methods, Results, and Discussion sections. TP17: Composing the Conclusion Section: Differentiating Conclusions from Abstract Summary. TP18: Critically Formulating Limitations and Future Research Directions. TP19: Mastery of Digital Citation Tools (Mendeley/Zotero) for Organizing References. TP20: Practice Integrating In-text Citation and Environmental Style Adjustments (APA, Harvard, IEEE). TP21: Ethics of Scientific Writing: Understanding Plagiarism, Self-Plagiarism, Salami Slicing, and Data Fabrication. TP22: Ethical Boundaries and Responsible Use of AI (Prompt Engineering & AI Declaration). TP23: Paraphrasing Techniques and Using Academic Phrasebank to Avoid Text Similarities. TP24: Similarity Index Management Using Plagiarism Detection Software (Turnitin/iThenticate). TP25: Project : Similarity Audit: Checking draft articles on Turnitin and revising paragraphs with a similarity index above 15%. TP26: Identify and compare the 3 most suitable target journals (SINTA 1/2/3 or Scopus Q3-Q4). TP27: Recognizing and Avoiding Predatory Journals and Discontinued Journals. TP28: Understanding the Guide for Authors and Preparing Supporting Documents (Supplementary Materials). TP29: Cover Letter Writing: Design a formal 1-page cover letter explaining why the article is worthy of publication. TP30: Simulate filling in metadata and uploading files on the OJS platform or Editorial Manager system. TP31: Changing Editorial Decisions: Understanding the Meaning of Desk Reject, Major Revision, and Minor Revision. TP32: Final Manuscript Package: Presentation and submission of the complete article manuscript package (Article + Cover Letter + Turnitin Check Proof) ready to be uploaded to the target journal.

BK1: content: Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. description: Deskripsi 1 BK2: content: Belcher, W. L. (2019). Writing Your Journal Article in Twelve Weeks: A Guide to Academic Publishing Success (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. description: Deskripsi 2 BK3: content: Taufik, M., & Kurniawan, A. (2022). Panduan Praktis Menulis Artikel Ilmiah Bereputasi Internasional. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. description: Deskripsi 3 BK4: content: Rethlefsen, M. L., dkk. (2021). Penjelasan dan Elaborasi PRISMA 2020: Panduan Mutakhir untuk Pelaporan Tinjauan Sistematis. BMJ. description: Deskripsi 4 BK5: content: Taufik, M., & Kurniawan, A. (2022). Panduan Praktis Menulis Artikel Ilmiah Bereputasi Internasional. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. description: Deskripsi 5

This course is designed to equip Doctoral, Master of Accounting, and Master of Management students with the ability to compile an international-quality literature review as the foundation for their thesis. The OBE-based approach emphasizes the output in the form of a ready-to-use draft of Chapter 2. Students will learn to differentiate research paradigms (summary vs. synthesis), the hierarchy of evidence, precision search strategies (Boolean and AI), critical evaluation (CRAAP), bibliometric mapping (Connected Papers), reference management (Mendeley), and publication ethics and the use of AI. The interactive learning method (Zoom) uses the Feynman and Podomoro techniques to ensure cross-disciplinary understanding.

CPMK1: Able to critically analyze various types of literature sources (primary, secondary, tertiary) and map multidisciplinary research maps within the scope of Doctor of Management, Master of Management (Finance, HR, Marketing, Operations) and Master of Accounting (Audit, Taxation and Finance) appropriately to identify research gaps. CPMK2: Able to evaluate the credibility of scientific sources (including predatory journals) and apply publication ethics and ethical boundaries of the use of AI in academic writing. CPMK3: Able to construct a theoretical framework and synthesize (not just summarize) various sources to draft a systematic, structured literature review that contributes to the development of management science. CPMK4: Able to implement digital and AI tools (Mendeley, Dimensions.ai, Scispace, Publish or Perish) effectively for reference management, bibliometric visualization, and literature search automation.

SCPMK1: Able to differentiate primary, secondary, tertiary literature and select the appropriate scientific database SCPMK2: Able to design precision search strategies using Boolean & AI SCPMK3: Able to evaluate the credibility of sources and map research clusters SCPMK4: Able to install, sync and use Mendeley Cite for automatic citations SCPMK5: Able to compile literature synthesis and formulate research gaps SCPMK6: Able to write a structured literature review draft in a scientific style SCPMK7: Able to understand PRISMA, avoid plagiarism, and apply publication ethics SCPMK8: Able to integrate all competencies in one LR product

AP1: Pre Test AP2: Learning AP3: Post Test AP4: Learning AP5: Post Test AP6: Learning AP7: Post Test AP8: Project AP9: Pre Test AP10: Learning AP11: Post Test AP12: Learning AP13: Post Test AP14: Learning AP15: Post Test AP16: Learning AP17: Post Test AP18: Learning AP19: Post Test AP20: Learning AP21: Post Test AP22: Project AP23: Pre Test AP24: Learning AP25: Post Test AP26: Learning AP27: Post Test AP28: Learning AP29: Post Test AP30: Learning AP31: Post Test AP32: Learning AP33: Post Test AP34: Learning AP35: Post Test AP36: Learning AP37: Post Test AP38: Learning AP39: Post Test AP40: Learning AP41: Post Test AP42: Learning AP43: Post Test AP44: Learning AP45: Post Test AP46: Learning AP47: Post Test AP48: Learning AP49: Post Test AP50: Learning AP51: Post Test AP52: Learning AP53: Post Test AP54: Learning AP55: Post Test AP56: Learning AP57: Post Test AP58: Project

TP1: Definition & function of LR for S2/S3. TP2: EBP Pyramid TP3: Literary genres: P, S, T. TP4: Reputable databases (Scopus, WoS, DOAJ, Dimensions, Google Scholar). TP5: Project: Exploration of thesis topic in Dimensions & DOAJ. TP6: Operator Boolean (AND, OR, NOT). TP7: Utilizing Perplexity.ai & Scispace. TP8: Introduction to Publish or Perish. TP9: Project : Create 1 complex search string of research topic. TP10: Literature Map Analysis & Visualization: CRAAP Test & predatory journal detection. TP11: Literature Map Analysis & Visualization: Connected Papers TP12: Project : Analyze 1 journal with CRAAP & create a Connected Papers map from 1 key article. TP13: References (Mendeley Web & Add-ins): Installing Mendeley Cite in Word. TP14: References (Mendeley Web & Add-ins): Mendeley Web and Web Importer. TP15: References (Mendeley Web & Add-ins): Folder and duplicate management. TP16: References (Mendeley Web & Add-ins): Techniques for inserting citations and bibliographies. TP17: Project: Complete the challenge: 3 citations + bibliography in Word. TP18: Synthesis & Research Gap: Synthesis vs. Summary (Claim+Evidence+Comment Formula) TP19: Synthesis & Research Gap: Matrix Synthesis. TP20: Synthesis & Research Gap: 5 Types of Research Gaps. TP21: Synthesis & Research Gap: Utilizing Scispace to identify gaps. TP22: Project: Create 1 synthesis paragraph + 1 gap statement sentence. TP23: Advanced Writing & Citation Techniques: Hourglass Model Structure. TP24: Advanced Writing & Citation Techniques: Thematic, Chronological, Methodological Organization. TP25: Advanced Writing & Citation Techniques: Narrative vs. Parenthetical Citation. TP26: Advanced Writing & Citation Techniques: Proofreading with AI. TP27: Project : Write a draft LR (500+ words) with 10 citations. TP28: Publication Ethics & SLR: DSLR and PRISMA Diagram 2020. TP29: Publication Ethics & SLR: Plagiarism & Turnitin Demo. TP30: Publication Ethics & SLR: AI Ethics (Q1 journal policy). TP31: Project: Check the similarity of the draft LR20%) and create a PRISMA diagram. TP32: Project: Mini Literature Review (1000 words)

BK1: content: Scribbr. (2023). *How to Write a Literature Review description: Deskripsi 1 BK2: content: UW-Madison Libraries. (2024). Literature Reviews in the Sciences – Lesson 1: What is a Literature Review. Tersedia di: https://learn.library.wisc.edu/literature-reviews-in-the-sciences/lesson-1/ description: Deskripsi 2 BK3: content: Monash University. (2025). *Literature Review description: Deskripsi 3 BK4: content: Materi Ajar Perkuliahan (PPT & Modul) – Dosen Pengampu. (2026). description: Deskripsi 4 BK5: content: Beall, J. (2020). Beall's List of Predatory Journals and Publishers. Tersedia di: https://beallslist.net/ description: Deskripsi 5 BK6: content: Mendeley Support. (2025). Mendeley Cite – User Guide. Tersedia di: https://www.mendeley.com/guides description: Deskripsi 6 BK7: content: Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. (Scopus Q1). description: Deskripsi 7